Girl Scouts ‘Cancel’ Congrats to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett

Someone was going to fill the vacant seat of the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

It is delusional to think the Democrats, in the same situation, would have risked the opportunity until after a hotly contested election.

The Republicans could have picked any number of odious male candidates who used their gender and class privilege and Ivy League educations to shield corporate clients from accountability for misdeeds around the world.

Instead, they chose Amy Coney Barrett, who received the American Bar Association’s highest rating, a beloved former law professor at Notre Dame, and the mother of seven children, one with Down Syndrome and two adopted from Haiti. Barrett, who is Catholic, promised to “resist her policy preferences” and “private beliefs” and always follow the rule of law.

It was in keeping with the Girl Scouts’ mission of encouraging strong girls and embracing individuality to post the following message on Twitter:

“Congratulations Amy Coney Barrett on becoming the 5th woman appointed to the Supreme Court since its inception in 1789.”

What wasn’t in keeping with the Girl Scout’s mission was what happened next. The Girl Scout’s quickly removed the tweet after it elicited criticism. The Girl Scouts said the tweet was “viewed as a political and partisan statement which was not our intent.”

Continue reading “Girl Scouts ‘Cancel’ Congrats to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett”

AZ Takes A Step Toward Revolutionizing The Delivery of Legal Services In U.S.

The Arizona Supreme Court has approved what can only be called a game changer in provision of legal services in America.

The court is the first in the nation to adopt a new rule that permits a new type of legal services firm in the state – an Alternative Business Structure – that can be co-owned by non-lawyers

The court also authorized non-lawyers to obtain a state license to work as a “legal paraprofessional” and provide limited legal services.

Historically, every state’s organized bar association has had a stranglehold on the legal services delivery in their state. They fended off competition from out of state attorneys and industries closely associated with the practice of law, such as insurers and accountants. Their resistance to change and innovation has crippled the ability of poor and middle-class Americans to get legal help, especially for civil matters.

Continue reading “AZ Takes A Step Toward Revolutionizing The Delivery of Legal Services In U.S.”

Spaeth v. Age Discrimination in American Law Schools

Update,  on Mar 17, 2014, Nicholas Spaeth was found dead in his apartment in North Dakota, in what authorities have treated as a suicide.

Update, May 2013: Nicholas Spaeth’s complaint against Georgetown University was dismissed before it could ever reach a jury in May 2013.  U.S. District Court Judge  Ellen Segal Huvelle ruled the use of words such as “young” or “pick of the litter” in discussing law professor applicants was not evidence of discrimination against older applicants in Georgetown University Law Center’s hiring process. (editors note: Really???) Spaeth produced an internal university memorandum discussing the need to hire “promising young scholars” and praising the “young cohorts” at peer institutions as an example of bias against older candidates. 

Update, February 2011:  A federal judge ruled in February 2011 that a law school professor suing six law schools for employment discrimination based on age must sue each of the schools separately and in their home districts.  Nicholas Spaeth sued Michigan State University College of Law, the University of Missouri School of law, Hastings College of the Law, University of Iowa College of Law, the University of Maryland, Baltimore and Georgetown University, claiming that the schools passed him up for a tenured teaching position, opting for younger candidates instead. U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle denied the schools’ motion to dismiss the claims, but agreed that each school had to be sued separately and within their home district. Below is the story I wrote about Spaeth’s first lawsuit against Michigan.

A former attorney general for the state of North Dakota is challenging blatant age discrimination in hiring in American law schools.

A complaint filed by Nicholas Spaeth, 60, in U.S. District Court describes a scenario that is so egregious that, if true, one can only hope the perpetrators find themselves on the job market soon (very soon) facing employers just like themselves. Click here to read the complaint.

The defendant is the Michigan State University College of Law, East Lansing, Michigan, though it appears that many others will join Michigan in the defendant’s box.

Spaeth, a magna cum laude graduate of Stanford Law School, says he couldn’t even get an interview for several advertised teaching position at the law school. He has served as general counsel at three publicly held companies with billions in assets, argued a groundbreaking tax case before the U.S. Supreme Court, and was a partner at three law firms. He also taught for four years at the University of Missouri School of Law, three years as an adjunct and one year as a visiting professor.

Let’s just say the guy has stellar qualifications.

The complaint states the law school ended up hiring three attorneys for the 2011-2012 school year who graduated in 2006, 2005 and 2001, respectively. All three allegedly had far less experience both qualitatively and quantitatively than Spaeth. In fact, the complaint states that one of the new hires had no experience as a legal practitioner.

The applicant who was hired by Michigan to teach in Spaeth’s area of speciality, corporate taxation, had three years of practical experience as an associate in a law firm.  Spaeth, who served two four-year terms as North Dakota’s Attorney General,  is a former general counsel of H & R Block.

Going through an experience like the one described by Spaeth would make any job applicant feel like he was whacked upside the head with a two-by-four plank.

And it is always worse when a law school  discriminates because a law school educates students who will one day be the attorneys and judges who are enforcing our nation’s anti-discrimination laws. Don’t these guys teach employment law?  One shouldn’t jump to conclusions though.  We’ve only heard Spaeth’s side of the story. It will be interesting to see Michigan’s answer to Spaeth’s complaint.  (Right now, I suspect they’re sweating!)

[According to Wikipedia, Spaeth does not go with the flow. He  is the only statewide, elected official in North Dakota’s history not to be endorsed by the National Rifle Association.  He is a life-long advocate of gun control.]

The dean of Michigan State University College of Law is Joan W. Horwath, who is described as an expert on gender and the death penalty and a leader in legal education through work with the Association of American Law Schools, the American Bar Association, and the Society of American Law Teachers.  She is quoted by the Blog of the Legal Times as stating the school has not yet received notice of Spaeth’s complaint.  She added: “When or if one comes our way it will be a false accusation because we do not and have not discriminated on the basis of age.”  (FYI – I am old enough to remember a time when women could not attend many prestigious universities and law schools in this country because they were women. That was just 30 years ago. People like Joan have reaped the benefits of a struggle undertaken by generations of victims of sex discrimination. As an expert in gender, one would certainly hope that Joan would insure that her own law school didn’t engage in discriminatory practices.)

Attorneys Lynne Bernabei and Alan Kabat of Washington’s Bernabei & Wachtel represent Spaeth, who previously filed complaints with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against more than 100 law schools that also did not offer him an interview at the Association of American Law Schools’  Faculty Recruitment Conference.