<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WHEN THE ABUSER GOES TO WORK &#187; attorney fees</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/attorney-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com</link>
	<description>An Employment Law Blog about Workplace Bullying, Discrimination &#38; Abuse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 01:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>EEOC Whacked Again on Background Checks</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/eeoc-whacked-again-on-background-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/eeoc-whacked-again-on-background-checks/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Peoplemark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII of of the Civil Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=9539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch! Another court has rejected the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s initiative to combat race discrimination by limiting the use of criminal background checks in hiring. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Michigan this week upheld a lower court ruling requiring the EEOC to pay $751,942.48 in fees and costs to [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/eeoc-whacked-again-on-background-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Female Drivers Crash and Burn in Iowa</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/female-drivers-crash-and-burn-in-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/female-drivers-crash-and-burn-in-iowa/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRST Van Expedited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monika Starke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. District Judge Linda R. Reade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=9012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s easy to forget that EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. started with a 2005 complaint by a female truck driver trainee who said she was sexually harassed  by her two “Lead Trainers.”  Chief Judge Linda R. Reade of the U.S. District Court of Iowa ruled recently that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission  must pay CRST, one [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/female-drivers-crash-and-burn-in-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Can Keep Worthless Coupons?</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/8516/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/8516/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action Fairness Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In re: HP Inkjet Printer Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink cartridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court ofr Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=8516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too often,  in a consumer-based class action lawsuit, class members receive a  worthless “coupon” to purchase the defendant’s products. And nothing changes. This was the ignominious conclusion of an eight-year-old class action lawsuit against Hewlett Packard Company, which allegedly cheated consumers with respect to the sale of ink cartridges from 2001 to 2010.  However, an [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/8516/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
