A Quadrillion, Trillion or Billion To One Long Shot Falls Short

Some novelist somewhere is writing a book about how malevolent forces in a political party used a worldwide pandemic to throw a U.S. Presidential election in four swing states under its control.

When voters caught on, they went to the courts in these four states – lets say, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – and demanded justice. But the courts refused to act. And so did the state legislatures. (Skeptics said it was because they were controlled by the “Winning Party.)

The “Losing Party,” which seemingly was caught unawares, was ostensibly outraged that its Presidential candidate was robbed of a solid victory.  

In truth, the leaders didn’t care much for their loud-mouth Presidential candidate. He was an outsider, always making trouble, and his alma mater is second-tier Ivy League. More importantly, the corruption in the four states didn’t affect down ballot voting and the “Losing Party” actually picked up many Congressional seats and grew much stronger. The leaders of the “Losing Party” stayed mostly quiet.

Point of No Return

At the point of no return, the hero of this tale, The Lone Star state of Texas,  filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court in the land. It argued the four rogue states had invalidated the will of voters of the state of Texas and the country as a whole. There was no other forum for redress, Texas argued.

Continue reading “A Quadrillion, Trillion or Billion To One Long Shot Falls Short”

Actual Finding Of Election Fraud Gets Twitter ‘Disputed’ Warning

This is a sign of the times.

A finding of actual election fraud in Arizona Thursday was slapped with a Twitter warning: “This claim about election fraud is disputed.”

How is this disputable? If votes were altered; that’s election fraud. And there is evidence that votes were altered in AZ. On what basis is Twitter, a social media platform, disputing this?

Continue reading “Actual Finding Of Election Fraud Gets Twitter ‘Disputed’ Warning”