What are the chances employers will hire job applicants who opt-out of a “voluntary” clause that requires them to forgo their right to file a lawsuit if they are subject to future civil rights violations?
Lori Burchett thought the odds were not good when she applied to work as a “My Stylist” at a Macy’s Inc. store at Oak Brook Center in Illinois in 2017. In any case, she didn’t want to gamble. She needed a job.
Burchett, then 58, agreed to something that was clearly not in her best interests, a clause requiring her to submit to arbitration any future claims of employment discrimination based on age, gender and race.
In the following months, Burchett alleges she encountered gross age discrimination from managers and coworkers that led to her termination by Macy’s in 2018.
U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman earlier this month dismissed Burchett’s age discrimination lawsuit and granted Macy’s motion to compel arbitration in the case.
Judge Coleman notes that Burchett, who represented herself, “contends that Macy’s would not have hired her if she did not sign the arbitration agreement.”
But Judge Coleman said Macy’s legal team provided “painstakingly detailed evidence and averments” that Burchett was informed in advance of hire that she could opt-out of the arbitration clause.
“Without proof to the contrary, courts will not presume that arbitration is unfair or biased, especially in light of federal policy favoring arbitration,” ruled Judge Coleman.
Apparently, Burchett’s “averments” did not constitute evidence or proof to the contrary.
The implications of Judge Coleman’s ruling is that employers can easily exempt themselves from being sued in federal courts for future violations of U.S. civil rights laws simply by asking job applicants to sign a “voluntary” arbitration clause in an employment agreement.Continue reading “A Primer On How Employers Can Exempt Themselves From Civil Rights Laws”