<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WHEN THE ABUSER GOES TO WORK &#187; The U.S. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/the-u-s-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com</link>
	<description>An Employment Law Blog about Workplace Bullying, Discrimination &#38; Abuse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 21:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Fed Cts Eschew SM</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/fed-cts-eschew-sm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/fed-cts-eschew-sm/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=8585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are federal courts out of touch?  The National Center for State Courts reported the results of a recent survey that would indicate that federal courts literally are out of touch. The survey shows federal courts have thus far largely eschewed the use of “social media,” including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.  Out of the 135 responding courts, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/fed-cts-eschew-sm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges who Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/judges-who-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/judges-who-blog/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["workplace bullying"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["workplace violence"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawSites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native American Tribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen Bees & Psychopaths in the Workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surivving Bullies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federalist Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the work of a judge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=8136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was surprised to find out this week from LawSites that I may be one of only three judges in the United States who “blog.”  I am an appellate justice for a Native American tribe in Northern Nevada. I work for a sovereign nation that has its own court and code of laws but  is bound [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/judges-who-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immunity from Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/how-to-get-immunity-from-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/how-to-get-immunity-from-class-action/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["pattern and practice" of discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chin v. Port Authority of New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Arbitration Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H. Christina Chen-Oster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Parisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Women's Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parisi v. Goldman Sachs & Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shanna Orlich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Second Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=7613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workers this week suffered another  potentially devastating blow when an influential appellate court ruled in Parisi v. Goldman Sachs &#38; Co, that a former managing director could not file a class action lawsuit against  Goldman Sachs for sex discrimination because she had signed a contract agreement to arbitrate employment disputes. The decision by the  Second Circuit Court of Appeals [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/how-to-get-immunity-from-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Untouchables on Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/the-untouchables/</link>
		<comments>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/the-untouchables/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pgbarnes]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DISPATCHES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Alpert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabell;i Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabelli v. SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Gabelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Untouchables documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time zone arbitrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Securities Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abusergoestowork.com/?p=7464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the federal appellate decisions I read every week explain why federal judges were entirely correct when they summarily dismissed a worker’s claims against an employer before the case even got to a jury. So few of these cases make it through the federal judiciary that it has raised questions about objectivity and balance. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abusergoestowork.com/the-untouchables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
