Abuse in Hiring: Michigan Law School?

Update, May 2013: Nicholas Spaeth’s complaint against Georgetown University was dismissed before it could ever reach a jury in May 2013.  U.S. District Court Judge  Ellen Segal Huvelle ruled the use of words such as “young” or “pick of the litter” in discussing law professor applicants was not evidence of discrimination against older applicants in Georgetown University Law Center’s hiring process. (editors note: Really???) Spaeth produced an internal university memorandum discussing the need to hire “promising young scholars” and praising the “young cohorts” at peer institutions as an example of bias against older candidates. 

Update, February 2011:  A federal judge ruled in February 2011 that a law school professor suing six law schools for employment discrimination based on age must sue each of the schools separately and in their home districts.  Nicholas Spaeth sued Michigan State University College of Law, the University of Missouri School of law, Hastings College of the Law, University of Iowa College of Law, the University of Maryland, Baltimore and Georgetown University, claiming that the schools passed him up for a tenured teaching position, opting for younger candidates instead. U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle denied the schools’ motion to dismiss the claims, but agreed that each school had to be sued separately and within their home district. Below is the story I wrote about Spaeth’s first lawsuit against Michigan. PGB

Equal Employment Opportunity …  for Everyone Else

July 30, 2011:  When one thinks of workplace abuse, one doesn’t immediately think of abuse in hiring.  Maybe we should!

Click here to read a complaint filed in U.S. District Court last week by Nicholas Spaeth, 60, the former state attorney general for North Dakota,  that describes a scenario so egregious that, if true, one can only hope the perpetrators find themselves on the job market soon (very soon) facing employers just like themselves.

The defendant is the Michigan State University College of Law, East Lansing, Michigan, though it appears that many others will join Michigan in the defendant’s box.

Spaeth, a magna cum laude graduate of Stanford Law School, says he couldn’t even get an interview for several advertised teaching position at the law school. He has served as general counsel at three publicly held companies with billions in assets, argued a groundbreaking tax case before the U.S. Supreme Court, and was a partner at three law firms. He also taught for four years at the University of Missouri School of Law, three years as an adjunct and one year as a visiting professor.

Let’s just say the guy has stellar qualifications.

The complaint states the law school ended up hiring three attorneys for the 2011-2012 school year who graduated in 2006, 2005 and 2001, respectively. All three allegedly had far less experience both qualitatively and quantitatively than Spaeth. In fact, the complaint states that one of the new hires had no experience as a legal practitioner.

The applicant who was hired by Michigan to teach in Spaeth’s area of speciality, corporate taxation, had three years of practical experience as an associate in a law firm.  Spaeth, who served two four-year terms as North Dakota’s Attorney General,  is a former general counsel of H & R Block.

Going through an experience like the one described by Spaeth would make any job applicant feel like he was whacked upside the head with a two-by-four plank.

And it is always worse when a law school  discriminates because a law school educates students who will one day be the attorneys and judges who are enforcing our nation’s anti-discrimination laws. Don’t these guys teach employment law?  One shouldn’t jump to conclusions though.  We’ve only heard Spaeth’s side of the story. It will be interesting to see Michigan’s answer to Spaeth’s complaint.  (Right now, I suspect they’re sweating!)

[According to Wikipedia, Spaeth does not go with the flow. He  is the only statewide, elected official in North Dakota's history not to be endorsed by the National Rifle Association.  He is a life-long advocate of gun control.]

The dean of Michigan State University College of Law is Joan W. Horwath, who is described as an expert on gender and the death penalty and a leader in legal education through work with the Association of American Law Schools, the American Bar Association, and the Society of American Law Teachers.  She is quoted by the Blog of the Legal Times as stating the school has not yet received notice of Spaeth’s complaint.  She added: “When or if one comes our way it will be a false accusation because we do not and have not discriminated on the basis of age.”  (FYI – I am old enough to remember a time when women could not attend many prestigious universities and law schools in this country because they were women. That was just 30 years ago. People like Joan have reaped the benefits of a struggle undertaken by generations of victims of sex discrimination. As an expert in gender, one would certainly hope that Joan would insure that her own law school didn’t engage in discriminatory practices.)

Attorneys Lynne Bernabei and Alan Kabat of Washington’s Bernabei & Wachtel represent Spaeth, who previously filed complaints with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against more than 100 law schools that also did not offer him an interview at the Association of American Law Schools’  Faculty Recruitment Conference.

Crisis of Leadership

Interesting thoughts on leadership  by essayist and critic William Deresiewicz in an article entitled Solitude and Leadership: If you want others to follow, learn to be alone with your thoughts – published by The American Scholar:

  • Why is it so often that the best people are stuck in the middle and the people who are running things—the leaders—are the mediocrities? Because excellence isn’t usually what gets you up the greasy pole. What gets you up is a talent for maneuvering. Kissing up to the people above you, kicking down to the people below you. Pleasing your teachers, pleasing your superiors, picking a powerful mentor and riding his coattails until it’s time to stab him in the back. Jumping through hoops. Getting along by going along. Being whatever other people want you to be …Not taking stupid risks like trying to change how things are done or question why they’re done. Just keeping the routine going.
  • We have a crisis of leadership in this country, in every institution. Not just in government. Look at what happened to American corporations in recent decades, as all the old dinosaurs like General Motors or TWA or U.S. Steel fell apart. Look at what happened to Wall Street in just the last couple of years …
  •  … our overwhelming power and wealth, earned under earlier generations of leaders, made us complacent, and for too long we have been training leaders who only know how to keep the routine going. Who can answer questions, but don’t know how to ask them. Who can fulfill goals, but don’t know how to set them. Who think about how to get things done, but not whether they’re worth doing in the first place.
  • … What we don’t have are leaders. What we don’t have, in other words, are thinkers. People who can think for themselves. People who can formulate a new direction: for the country, for a corporation or a college, for the Army—a new way of doing things, a new way of looking at things. People, in other words, with vision.
  • …  true leadership means being able to think for yourself and act on your convictions.
  • Thinking means concentrating on one thing long enough to develop an idea about it. Not learning other people’s ideas, or memorizing a body of information, however much those may sometimes be useful. Developing your own ideas. In short, thinking for yourself. You simply cannot do that in bursts of 20 seconds at a time, constantly interrupted by Facebook messages or Twitter tweets, or fiddling with your iPod, or watching something on YouTube.

Minnesota School Bully Lawsuit

June 22, 2011 – In recent years, schoolyard bullying has become a focus of concern in America, and this concern has spilled over to  workplace bullying.

Now Minnesota’s biggest school district is being sued for allegedly enacting policies that discriminate against homosexual students in its Anoka-Hennpin School District. As a result, the lawsuit alleges, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students and those “perceived as LGBT have been subjected to a constant torrent of slurs and have been physically threatened or attacked by peers.”  See complaint here.

The suit objects to the school district’s “Sexual Orientation Curriculum Policy,” which allegedly prohibits staffers from acknowledging the existence of LGBT people and, according to the suit, prevents teachers from effectively intervening when they see bullying taking place.  The policy states: “Anoka-Hennepin staff, in the course of their professional duties, shall remain neutral on matters regarding sexual orientation including but not limited to student led discussions.”

The lawsuit states three distinct causes of action:

  •  U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV, Denial of Equal Protection on the Basis of Sexual Orientation

Defendants, acting under color of state law, have deprived plaintiffs of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, in that Defendants, without justification, have Treated plaintiffs differently than other similarly situated students and student groups on  basis of actual or perceived sexual orientation.

  • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq.Discrimination Based on Sex 

The School District and each school within the District attended are recipients of federal financial assistance. The acts and omissions of Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under Title IX by discriminating on the basis of sex. Defendants had actual notice that harassment based on sex was so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it created a hostile climate based on sex that deprived Plaintiffs of access to educational programs, activities, and opportunities.

[Note: Title IX states that "no person" (which includes workers!) in the  United States "shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance ... ." ]

  •  Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363A.13-.14 Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation

The acts and omissions of Defendants violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the Minnesota Human Rights Act by discriminating against their full utilization and benefit of an educational institution on the basis of sexual orientation. Defendants aided, abetted, and incited discrimination against Plaintiffs based on sexual orientation that prevented her full utilization of and benefit from an educational institution.

The suit was brought by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the National Center for Lesbian Rights, and the law firm of Faegre & Benson.